Two of those charged in the båldrapet on the Southern Countries have linked both himself and the third defendant to the murder.
I can’t say much more than that they relate to the matter, since it is a third person who has not explained himself yet. Up to now he did not want questioning, ” says politiadvokat Kristian Johansen to VG.
the Woman (44) is the former girlfriend of 35-year-old. Both she and her son (20) has explained about the previously convicted 35-year-old. None of them has acknowledged straffskyld.
They associate both himself and the two other indictees to the matter, without that I will go into further details, ” says Johansen.
It was NRK that mentioned the matter first, in connection with any of the three manufactured for refengsling in the day.
WILL CAPTIVATE: Politiadvokat Kristian Johansen still requires varetektsfengsel for the three charged.
Photo: Jarle Grivi Brenna, VG
see also: the Police theory: Killed and left in the confirmation
Arrested after 73 days
Nils Olav Bakken (49) was found dead in a bonfire on the Veståsen in Southern Countries 3. september. The ground had not even car and is probably been driven to the site by those who killed him. The ride will take around 25 minutes.
73 days after the murder, the three apprehended by the police. The woman, who is in the 40s, was arrested together with his son in the-20s and a man in 30 years.
Close friend: the Defendant burned the dog on fire
Refuse to explain themselves
It is a 35-year-old who has not explained himself to the police since the first initial interrogation when he was arrested. It happened without that defence counsel was present.
In this interrogation, it took 22 minutes before he was made acquainted with their rights, after the criminal. Then, he had already seen pågripelsesbeslutningen and charge and started to explain themselves, ” said defender Per Espen Owned.
He is highly critical of the police not made him familiar with their rights until after the interrogation was in progress.
I’m surprised both that one is doing it, and that you defend it in the aftermath. I have pointed out that the interrogation can’t be used as evidence, and this is a part of the discussion with the police, ” says Eid.
Police do not want to comment on Eids statements.
No comments:
Post a Comment