the State will not change the location of the memorial for 22. July, instead, they offer a financial compensation to the neighbors. It comes forward in a press release from the neighbors, which strongly respond to the offer.
Kulturkommentator in NRK, Agnes Moxnes, understand that the neighbors are experiencing the state’s offer as provocative.
UNDERSTAND the NEIGHBORS: Agnes Moxnes realize that the neighbors to the planned memorial at Sørbråten allow themselves to provoke of the state’s offer of cash compensation.
Photo: NRK
– Yes, I know the neighbors very well. Both because they made a bet 22. July and because they have not be heard in the development of this memorial site. Hole municipality suggested other places to have a memorial, and the state reviewed both the municipality and the neighbours.
– Should treated the matter differently
Moxnes adds that for the neighbors is it that they want to change the location for the memorial. The offer to the state comes at a strange time, ” she believes.
this Whole case has come out of position, so to come with a money offers now seems very strange. It is yet another example of the communication between the neighbors to the memorial on Sørbråten and the government has been pretty bad the whole way.
Moxnes says that the state should have done it differently from the start, but that it at the same time is easy to be etterpåklok.
– This is a situation that we’ve never been in before in the Uk. Then one can also understand why this was so crooked out.
Not correct
Regjeringsadvokat Anders Wilhelmsen
Photo: NRK
Anders Wilhelmsen is regjeringsadvokat. He did not want to allow himself to be interviewed in the matter, other than to come up with the following comment to NRK:
the State has in a post to the district court opened for negotiations on the design of the memorial and compensatory measures as shielding. It is not correct that the state has offered the plaintiffs the money to withdraw the case. However, the is understand is that we are above the plaintiffs ‘ lawyer, attorney, Stabell, also has said that we may be willing to negotiate about the compensation to the neighbors if the memorial demonstrably has led to reduced land value for them. So far, however, no one who has taken this up as applicable.
Can be tough in court
the Deadline to solve the case through mediation went out in 1. December. Now the case probably to the court, whether or not the state chooses to draw the proposal about the memorial on Sørbråten. Moxnes think the neighbors can get it tough in a court of law.
– It is not in any way obvious that the neighbors are going to win the case because there are major national interests that are larger than the neighbors. The state is a powerful actor in such a situation. They should also take account of those who experienced 22. July as a personal loss, and also others who are experiencing grief after the 22. July.
– How big are the chances that the state withdraws the proposal of the memorial on Sørbråten?
– It is difficult to say. They’ve come up with several outlived. One is that they could start again with this memorial, so this one is going with pengekompensasjonen.
None of the proposals go home, but it shows that the state in no way want a trial. Then comes the question about who one should take most into account in such a type case.
No comments:
Post a Comment