FRP insist on running parliamentary slalom with Sylvi Listhaug 40 tilstramningstiltak. Rapporteur Ingjerd Schou (H) has not managed to achieve a broad and unified settlement in Parliament about tightening such Right will. Relations between the Conservatives and the Progress Party has reached a new low point.
It was a great victory for the minority government Solberg when parliament minus SV and MDG before Christmas went together on an asylum settlement. The victory slipped. From July to June, FRP run a crude race to break the settlement.
Prime Minister Erna Solberg (H) invitation to Parliament last year to enter into a settlement was immediately caught by Aps Støre. It was large and Conservatives Trond Hell’s profits that the settlement could see the light of day in December. Instead of taking welcomed the settlement of Parliament chose immigration minister Sylvi Listhaug (FRP) to extend the settlement until it cracked during Christmas. Her list with 40 points went beyond the settlement comrades in Parliament had agreed on.
Follow Dagsavisen on Facebook and Twitter!
List Haugs list was sentenced north and down by professionals in the field and government two cooperating parties. It was therefore to be expected that the government would loosen the hard choice. It did not happen. Government final proposal, which Prime Minister Solberg and immigration minister Listhaug presented at a joint press conference, was almost a carbon copy of List Haugs 40 points.
The unresolved cheers in Progress parliamentary group, rage Left, disappointment in KrF and irritation of Labor. It was not easy to understand that the Prime Minister could vouch for suggestions that she knew it was not a majority for the Parliament. Even the Prime Minister has the power to the brake Progress Rip through asylum policy.
When asylum settlement was announced in December, claiming the Progress Party’s parliamentary leader Harald Tom Nesvik, the party had a majority for a policy that the party had fought alone for 30 years. And when the government’s proposal came in April, claimed Listhaug that Norway had Europe’s strictest asylum policy.
But when did the minister up bill without the host. Without the support of a majority in Parliament are all suggestions from the minority government of little worth. The priority of the FRP is not the decisions of Parliament. The main thing is to get shown off what the party stands for.
Minister Listhaug shuns nothing to shoot down the debate on her asylum policy. Aps cautious criticism against the bill including what goes on family reunification and the treatment of minors, are faced with allegations that Labor stands for a liberal asylum policy. Even on trips abroad, she runs partisan politics and accuses Parliament of wanting to introduce a liberal policy.
It is irresponsible of a minister. It is good etiquette that ministers traveling abroad to refrain from domestic political polemics. Listhaug have not understood that she is minister for Norway and not only for FRP. During his visit to Italy recently she claimed that Parliament is going to adopt a more liberal policy. Such undermines asylum settlement and send a completely wrong signal to Europe about what is Norwegian policy.
Parliamentary deliberations on the Government’s proposal will anyway end up in Norway gets its strictest policy ever. Labor has for its part never stood for a strict asylum policy now. It is not good enough for FRP. Party will demonstrate to the world that it is the strictest party in Parliament.
Also read: “Labor can swallow part of Listhaug. But not the worst. “
If FRP adapts a broad majority, it becomes harder to flag the party’s primary positions and criticize Labor. This is the lesson from Carl I. Hagen time. In the Parliament should the party vote for the party is for and against the party is against.
This “hagenske” form of parliamentarianism is impossible to use for a ruling party in a minority government. A minority government must to survive, humbling majority in Parliament. Humility is a foreign word for FRP. The question is how long Prime Minister Solberg may find themselves in the FRP undermine the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment