(Dagbladet): – The problem lies in the Parliament, not the government. Parliamentary group of FRP does not relate to its own government. They have developed a new form of parliamentarianism, where their own minister can go on defeat after defeat in his own parliamentary group, says Liberal leader Trine Skei Grande to Dagbladet.
– And who’s responsibility is it?
– it is FRP that weakens the government, not the prime minister, says Grande.
Frustration in Right
the party leader has just held the final press conference before the summer, and not surprisingly, FRP’s role as a party of government and partner a theme.
Dagbladet recently written several issues about how FRP’s political method makes government cooperation – and collaborated with KrF and Left – increasingly difficult.
in a number of cases have FRP’s double communication created friction both in and around the government.
– Culture difference is frustrating, have a Conservative representative told Dagbladet.
Also cooperation parties has responded:
– When FRP begins with a story telling that is not correct, then I can not keep quiet any longer, said Christian Democrat Hans Olav Syversen Dagbladet.
– the struggle on the relationship of trust between parties when it becomes much vacillation and games, said Trine Skei Grande.
– FRP weakens government
A few days afterwards could VG tell that Erna Solberg and Sylvi Listhaug allegedly had broken out in a hefty discussion in front of several other ministers, as the prime minister confronted the immigration minister Progress asylum strategy.
When Dagbladet speaks with Grande by the Liberal press conference adding she does not hide the fact that FRP’s double communication also can make negotiations on the green tax shift even more difficult.
– it’s exhausting, but it weakens often the one who wavers most. And that’s what makes FRP. It is more hopeless when chaos image it creates, than the actual pass-through.
Asked clear requirements
She says that it is particularly symbolic power of fees that make it difficult.
– I knew fee profile would be difficult. And it is obvious difficult. Some fees have a symbolic power for FRP which makes it particularly difficult, especially on petrol and diesel taxes, says Grande.
1. February 2016 went Liberal finance spokesperson Terje Breivik into the first negotiation meeting with the Conservative Party, Progress Party and the Christian Democratic Party about green tax shift, and the requirements were clear:
– We need significantly higher taxes on what we want less of, namely pollution and CO2 emissions, much less tax on what we want more of, namely employment, businesses and environmentally friendly behavior, said Breivik told Dagbladet on the way into the meeting.
the managers had to enter
as Dagbladet wrote before Christmas describes the green shift as an “acid test for cooperation with the government”, and among the items on requirements list is the ever so controversial fuel tax.
But four and a half month later, the negotiations now been lifted up to party leaders and parliamentary leaders. And the hope for a conclusion before the summer is out.
– Is it in FRP’s symbolic politics that makes this difficult, Grande ?
– I hope it is not, but in some parts there are cases that have symbolic power beyond themselves.
no to the center
Yet let no Left leader tempted by a wide central partnership with the Centre Party, which she dies as old-fashioned and stick conservatively.
This despite the fact that Democratic Party leader Knut Arild Hareide launched the idea for NTB earlier today.
– such a coalition has no majority. And majority we need to get to things. Then we must work to either the left or right. And we have been clear that we prefer a center-right cooperation, says Grande.
No comments:
Post a Comment