KrF and Left have had enough of FRP: “Demanding”, “problematic”, “conscious games … – Dagbladet.no

(Dagbladet): – I must be allowed to correct this image. When FRP begins with a story telling that is not correct, then I can not keep quiet any longer, says Hans Olav Syversen, fiscal spokesperson and acting parliamentary leader of the Christian Democratic Party.

History The story he refers to is a statement from the FRP’s second Vice Chairman and Minister of transport Ketil Solvik-Olsen told Dagbladet today.

in a case of FRP’s dobbeltkommuikasjon, including Others refer to Frp’s games around air passenger tax, then explains Solvik-Olsen following:

– the reason for the Progress Party’s initiative rematch was that Krf and Left in Østfold in media started talking about a rematch. We are obviously aware of what kind of role we have and that we must follow up what we have adopted. But when our cooperation parties signals rematch is natural that we also want to support it. When they let the dead, let also the parliamentary group is dead, says Solvik-Olsen.

Geir Ramnefjell comments: “FRP has institutionalized something new in Norwegian politics: open duplicity in government”

– Too weak of FRP

Hans Olav Syversen strongly resent that Solvik-Olsen blames the Democratic Party and Liberal local branches, and believes he twists the truth.

– the relationship is that KrF central addressed the issue of flypasasjeravgift with FRP and Right in connection with the negotiation of the revised budget, because we would hear about government parties would exchange the air passenger tax with others and more green fees – such as the CO2 tax. The answer from FRP and Right was silence. This happened long before the possible closure of Moss became a mediesak, says Syversen, adding:

– It is too weak to refer to a county rumblings from the Liberal and Democratic Party when the matter was taken up centrally at an earlier tidpsunkt.

He encourages Solvik-Olsen to ask their retailers about what is reality, before he makes statements.

– What do you think about Solvik-Olsen storytelling?

– It is quite problematic and not consistent with the reality. It is custom message that is inconsistent with what we perceive as facts.

– Demanding

– Do this it harder to be a joint party of government?

– Yes, it says almost obvious.

– Where is the pain threshold for KrF before it is no longer simply problematic?

– I will not go into, but I think it is demanding, it must say. I perceive that FRP comes with different messages to different audiences at different times, and it is tactically aware. This is not only demanding for KrF and Left, I also find that it is difficult for the Conservatives, said Syversen.

and he is right. in connection with Frp’s rematch on aircraft seat fee, described a parliament member from the Conservative situation as “frustrating” and “difficult.”

– it goes up the to but it is quite frustrating when we learned through the media that it could be a rematch. Siv Jensen defended the fee well in Parliament, everything seemed hurt good, and even Left was satisfied, and then unraveled in Progress parliamentary group. It could not have happened in the Conservative Party, and the cultural difference is frustrating, said the representative told Dagbladet.

– tiring

Neither Liberal leader Trine Skei Grande hide the fact that she is annoyed at FRP’s double game.

– We often see that the play becomes more important than the political goals, for example, on asylum and integration. The struggle on trust between the parties when it becomes much vacillation and games. When doubts also each other’s sincerity in cooperation. It’s tiring, says Grande Dagbladet.

– You mean this is conscious of FRP his side?

– it does not matter whether it is conscious or unconscious. This is a party with a lead, so whether it is conscious or is it poor management. Either way it is a problem.

SLAMS AGREEMENT: Here explains Liberal leader Trine Skei Grande why the party has chosen rejecting the controversial asylum proposals for immigration minister Sylvi Listhaug (FRP). Video: NTB Scanpix more

This is not the first time Left react to FRP’s double communication. In connection with the debate on air passenger tax as Left in February was forced to reveal the game behind the scenes.

When did Jensen first told Dagbladet that FRP has “accepted” the fee as part of the budget compromise, and that it was not part of the government’s budget proposal.

Terje Breivik pointed out then that it was wrong that the tax was put in place in 12 hours under budget negotiations, and refutes that it was the Liberals’ primary suggestions.

– the truth is that the model came from the government because FRP did not want higher taxes on fossil fuels. Then we must also expect that the model of government is thoughtful and quality assured, said Breivik in February.

– Skei Grande , how long can you live in a partnership with a government that works in this way?

– for Left is the policy that applies. As long as we get good solutions for environmental, school and small business, then it’s okay.

– And where are you satisfied?

– This spring has been very good, says Grande.

Will not speculate

Ketil Solvik-Olsen did not even want to drive this debate forward . Via its communications consultant, he writes the following in an sMS to Dagbladet:

– I think everyone knows FRP’s primary position. We stand by the settlement we have made, and see no point in conducting a debate where one speculates each other motive.