Friday, January 30, 2015

Sandberg in 2011: – They are going out of the country, not out in the country – Aftenposten

Sandberg in 2011: – They are going out of the country, not out in the country – Aftenposten

Friday afternoon in 15.30 times may become clear whether the Oslo District Court accepts the decision to forcibly move Mullah Krekar out ON the country – to Kyrksæterøra in Sor-Trondelag . There is also a possibility that the verdict will be postponed.

Oslo Police decided to forcibly move Krekar to asylum reception earl Hemne municipality after he was released from prison last Sunday, but the decision is disputed.

If the police receive support for the decision to forcibly move Krekar “on land”, it will be the same solution Per Sandberg joked about in 2011.

Sandberg turned to the proposal from Stoltenberg

Video uploaded on YouTube by Progress even 1 June 2011. The party has even given the title “Out OF country, not out ON the country, says Progress Party Per Sandberg.”

In the clip shows FRP vice chairman to a proposal Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg (Labor) had presented the day before that criminal asylum seekers could be charged a special residence outside the big cities.

Did Labor had misunderstood

Sandberg accusing Labor of Having missed when they tried to copy Progress rhetoric and proposals.

– FRP has said for several years that criminal asylum seekers to be sent out of the country. I think Labour has misunderstood this now and believe that FRP will send asylum seekers into the country. The course we have never said, says Sandberg in the video.

– The only solution to be found here, it is to do that Progress has said. Now, these asylum seekers into closed reception and sent out of the country, says Sandberg on.

The video, which is about criminal asylum seekers in general, were also presented at the Progress Facebook page.



Sandberg: – Oldies new

In a text message to Aftenposten writes Sandberg:

“Oldies again. Krekar is NOT an asylum seeker, he is a danger to national security, and it is the police who decide this. 2011 was a proposal to establish reception centers outside Oslo. Moreover both AP proposals “.

He writes:

” I and FRP has proposed closed reception centers for criminal asylum seekers. Depressed mood. I and FRP has proposed detention for people who are in danger to national security. Depressed mood. “

Impose report or domicile

The decision on forced relocation of Krekar to Kyrksæterøra is based on an instruction from Justice Minister Anders Anundsen (FRP) which allows police consider imposing persons Krekar a specific residence and notification.

This solution is based on an amendment to the Immigration Act section 105 that was made by Stoltenberggovernment that opens to impose foreigners report or a specific residence when they are adopted expelled but implementation is impossible.

– Unsatisfactory

Per Sandberg has stated that he is not satisfied with the solution the Ministry of Justice and the police have landed on for Krekar.

In Adresseavisen he said after Krekar solution became clear that the case is a travesty.

– No, I’m still abundantly clear, regardless of location is not satisfactory, not at all, he said to the newspaper 20. January.

– In Hemne he should have free movement within the municipal boundary, he has free access to mosque, and can receive visits from anyone, without limitation. He might as well have lived in Oslo, said Sandberg on.

Published: 30.jan. 2015 24:46

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment