Justice Minister Anders Anundsen (FRP) came to the third sentence in his report to Parliament when he pulled up the police investigation is initiated.
It was as expected. Most of those who took the floor in the debate afterwards, also showed that many conclusions must wait for the results of the investigation. A logical approach – if this matter solely acted to clarify the scope of possible mobile surveillance and who is behind.
But it does not. The is as much about what the Norwegian authorities at different times have done and not done to uncover such espionage, which government agencies should do what, and what attitudes they are governed by.
PST has made “limited investigations “
Police Security Service (PST) has previously conducted investigations without getting on the trail of false base stations, said Anundsen. The term he used these studies was that they have been “limited”. Neither PST or other agencies have made the kind of mapping Aftenposten has done.
Why not? That question remains unanswered.
And why did not PST obtain Aftenposten findings once they got the chance? Nor does it gave Anundsen no answer.
This is the authorities’ own responsibility
Justice Minister believes there is no basis for believing that there is confusion about responsibilities and roles between the agencies. This image is created by the media. He even spent much of the report to go through the roles, tasks and responsibilities to PST, National Security Authority, Oslo police, and the National Communications Authority and the ministries they are subject.
KrF leader Knut Arild Hareide believed the situation was characterized by a “fragmented responsibilities picture”. That is not to use excessive force, and it is obviously not something the media has devised.
Anundsen underlined laudable enough, the attention now directed at mobile monitoring, is important – regardless of the investigation in progress . He promised new reviews to ascertain whether procedures and allocation of responsibilities are clear enough and so he pointed ahead.
Anundsen traveled a defense
He went still far in the direction of to erect a fortification around the current supervisory general and especially PST. Such laundering is risky in light of what the main impression of this case, even after ANUNDSEN statement:
First, with the pressure that Aftenposten reports created, the government has set mobile surveillance at the country’s centers of power on the agenda.
per.anders.madsen@aftenposten.no
perandersmadsen
Also read: Also Barcode may have been exposed to mobile espionage
Several different actors stood probably behind mobile espionage
Aftenposten publishes all data for mobile espionage cases
Published :
No comments:
Post a Comment