OSLO / TROMSØ / KIRKENES (AP) Attorney and Russia knows Risnes think most Western camp would have been sent long ago if not politicians had interfered .
At 19.00 sent Foreign Minister Børge Brende out a press release that he since Friday had known that Russia says no to asylum rebounds over Storskog.
At the same time interviewing the air with an interview with Brende about the same, an interview that should have been done this morning.
The police have told that there are various practical, transient challenges that made it was it was temporary halt returns of the 77 asylum seekers who are forcibly placed Western camp outside Kirkenes.
Now it’s full stop in returns over Storskog until Norway and Russia have clarified the big political game.
– Not thoughtful
– This is a self-inflicted chaos, because the government has put this up in a way that is difficult workable. If you had followed normal procedures, they would have had much greater opportunities to implement the deportation one needs. Norway has long experience with deportation to Russia and there have never been any problems before, says lawyer Risnes VG.
He represents several of the asylum seekers in Western camp, but he is also a lawyer who has worked with Russian immigration law as a specialty for ten years. Having lived in Russia, studied Russian and had hundreds of immigration cases related to Russia, he said the following:
– I would go so far as to blame Norway and not Russia here. This does not seem particularly well thought out from the Norwegian side. Had followed the usual procedures and provided management resources to implement these, they would most of those in Western camp been sent out of Norway long ago.
– New instruction less effective
– These new rules are introduced has resulted in less efficient dispatch of unfounded asylum seekers, than was the case previously, in my view, elaborates Risnes.
He also believes it is worrisome that employees of the immigration administration is frustrated.
– It is worrying in itself that you start projects that are not well entrenched management. This is an unnecessary and politician created chaos. Had they refrained from meddling, and just given management resources to do this in the normal way, it would not become a big problem, says Risnes.
He believes that apprehension basis now must be regarded as having lapsed .
– If you no longer have any immediate plan of deportation, is a difficult to see that one has grounds for keeping someone detained. So I would think that the regime is repealed very quickly, says lawyer Brynjulf Risnæs, who represents several of the asylum seekers who were transported to Kirkenes pending removal.
Brende: – Falling on its own absurdity
Foreign Minister Brende (H) designates the case as demanding – but does not agree with the criticism from Risnes.
– These statements fall on its own absurdity. When Norway has had several thousand asylum seekers who have arrived here without foundation. I must say that this is a very challenging case. We must act together and responsibly. We have achieved the important in our talks with Russia and gained an understanding that ended the totally unacceptable asylum stream. Then there are also taken out of the thin air at this back extension has not been completed in line with what it has been agreed. We have after all returned 200 who are not entitled to protection in Norway and who has a valid residence in Russia or multiple visas. So it has now encountered a situation now where Russia wants a coordination of this.
Marek Linha, legal adviser in NOAS, have just returned from Kirkenes. He believes it is very worrying that Russia and Norway still has not reached an agreement on the question of asylum-returns over Storskog.
– This creates even more confusion for asylum seekers, in a situation they are in despair over from already. They are afraid of what’s going to happen now, says Linha, adding:
– This is arbitrary detention, and the court must decide whether it is the basis for detention of asylum seekers, he says .
No comments:
Post a Comment