– This was a shock. We are very sorry. We had not thought that this was going to happen, says 13-year-old to NRK after court on Tuesday concluded that it was appropriate to forcibly send the Palestinian girl and her family returned to Jordan in June.
The family had been nearly ten years in Norway. Neda says the family is very difficult, and that she wished they could come back.
– I find it so hard here now. We are at home most of the time. We have not done anything, and at school we have it so hard, says Neda.
– Does it cruelly
Head of support group for Neda, Heidi Bjergafjellet is shocked by the verdict.
– I had never expected this result. It shows what kind of society we have here in Norway, said a tearful Bjergafjellet said. It was she who conveyed the message to the family.
– When they learned that it was a “no”, they had not much more to say. All they want is to get home, she says.
The family’s lawyer Arild Bumblebee seems the verdict is surprising.
– Especially because the court did not assume the expert’s explanation and the child psychiatric facts in the case, said Bumblebee said.
He said the family members will spend a few days to consider whether to appeal, together with the support group and himself. And the time frame is important in the decision.
– An important factor is whether the family is able to endure one year pending the High Court’s treatment, says bumblebee Tuesday night.
– Disappointing
Christian Democratic Party (KrF) is disappointed that UNE was upheld in court.
– I thought that this family was part of the audience we have discussed, says immigration political spokesman for the Christian Democratic Party, Geir Sigbjørn Toskedal.
He also fears that asylum children who have lived in Norway, still being deported, despite even amnesty for asylum kids that came into force in late June. A report on how the regulations should be practiced allows, however, lacking.
With Left has KrF long fought for a long time resident asylum children to be in Norway and Toskedal has said that although parents acts untidy, children treated as independent legal entities, and the children’s best interests should be given greater emphasis in asylum policy.
Non pursuant
After the family was sent out in June last year appealed the expulsion decision by the Appeals Board. In November last year abolished the court decision, but only a week later adopted UNE a new and identical deportation orders.
The family sued the UNE for error in law and a number of other defects in the case, improper weighting of the child Best and that the expulsion was in violation of human rights.
But in Oslo District Court did they thus not upheld.
UNE happy
UNE is For its part satisfied with the decision.
– We note that the judgment supports UNE’s views on all points and states that UNE has considered the matter properly, says communications manager at UNE Bjorn Lyster said.
UNE believed that the interests of the child in isolation suggested that they were allowed to stay in Norway, but that other considerations may weigh heavier.
– UNE then laid greater emphasis on the parents of a years lied about who they were and where they came from. Such a trade-off has UNE right and duty to do, says Lyster.
Immigration Appeals believed that immigration control considerations weighed more heavily than that two of the family members have health problems and the overall interests of the child. (© NTB)
Published:
No comments:
Post a Comment