(Dagbladet): Gruppestyret in FRP’s parliamentary group decided at a meeting Thursday morning that they accept the controversial air passenger tax. Now there will be a new negotiation meeting on the revised National Thursday night.
– It’s a clarification of clarification, says Conservatives source acidic Dagbladet.
It was VG first reported the group board’s decision.
Standing behind
– Our starting point for negotiations in Parliament is to secure a majority for the government’s proposal to revise the National Budget. We stand firmly behind this proposal, says FRP’s finance policy spokesman Hans Andreas Limi VG.
After the Dagbladet gets lit, there was a meeting this morning that the FRP’s group board made this decision.
First two in the morning in the afternoon, Right, Left and Christian Democrats told this clarification, by the Dagbladet easily find. Thus continuing the negotiations, which were exposed by the message of FRP’s group meeting yesterday, the revised national budget at 20 tonight.
– The decision
Østfold representative Erlend Wiborg said yesterday that he would most like to remove air passenger tax, but other solutions that kept operating at Moss Airport Rygge, was also relevant.
Clearing fee was one of the suggestions that were recorded for the negotiations on the revised national budget, confirmed parliamentary leader Harald Tom Nesvik Wednesday night. Today, after what seems like a new turnaround, says Wiborg remains that he is very satisfied.
– You must read the entire decision, he said.
Thursday morning said Limi Dagbladet’s case was unduly escalated out last night.
– All four parties in Østfold, which stands in the midst of the situation, the concerned the same. Our group joined the airport affair should be a theme. And in Østfold it the aircraft seat fee that trams matter. The question is how we can find good solutions to a situation everything indicates will occur, said Limi Thursday morning.
Dagbladet is aware that the FRP’s maneuvers in the case has created severe irritation, not only in Left and KrF, but also among government partner Right. Negotiators have bad enough time as it is.
Christian Democrat Hans Olav Syversen said earlier Thursday that he thinks it is special that the Progress Party’s parliamentary speaker’s own party leader opposite. Siv Jensen, who is also finance minister, defended namely air passenger tax in parliamentary question on Wednesday.
– Frustration
For there has been frustration in Right of FRP’s penchant for rematch of decisions and compromises between government parties and cooperative parties.
Yesterday afternoon came FRP’s parliamentary group with “input” to the negotiations on the revised national budget and to find a solution that saves Rygge Airport. Parliament Erlend Wiborg from Østfold said he’d rather have your air passenger tax will be eliminated, but that he is also open to other solutions that rescues the airport.
Some of the Conservative shrugs, while others are frustrated and annoyed working.
unraveling
A member of parliament describes yesterday’s FRP rematch as “frustrating” and “difficult.”
– it goes up the to, but it’s pretty frustrating when we learned through the media that it could be a rematch. Siv Jensen defended the fee well in Parliament, everything seemed hurt good, and even Left was satisfied, and then unraveled in FRP’s parliamentary group. It could not have happened in the Conservative Party, and the cultural difference is frustrating, says the representative told Dagbladet.
– Deliberate double communication
Dagbladet is aware that in government circles was happy to get focused on what Jensen called “Aps touching care for Ryanair,” while the government parties stood firm against pressure from the controversial budget airline.
But then the FRP’s team meeting and demands for “new round” of air passenger duty attention. Attempts to downplay the order of FRP’s parliamentary group for their budget retailers, was halfhearted.
– This is deliberate double communication, says a Conservative source.
A another source in the party stressed that the Conservatives and the Progress party is addicted to emerge as a united team, and that any rounds of discussions when it approaches elections in 2017, will be difficult.
– Excellent cooperation
Parliamentary deputy the Conservative Party, Nikolai Astrup, entrust to finance politicians to comment flypassasjeravgiftens fate. He said the Conservatives and the Progress Party has an excellent working relationship.
– We stand together on important matters to modernize the country, he said .
– Is it frustration in the group over the second ruling party contender government?
We have a good working relationship and get to a lot together, responding Astrup.
– not conviviality
Former Conservative cabinet minister, now a partner in the First House, Morten Andreas Meyer, said that cooperation between the governing parties are well.– Both parties feel that they succeed and prosper. When tolerate much of each other. The climate of government, between Reed and Erna and between the ministers are very good. FRP’s decision rematch on air passenger tax creates no conviviality, but do not trigger serious crisis, says Meyer.
– It’s easy to be generous in tailwind. Erna Solberg exhibiting great spaciousness.
Can prey on parliamentary group
– But it may be more demanding of the two parliamentary groups. Conservative parliamentary tradition to act very loyally towards management and now the government. While getting FRP’s group allowed to challenge the government. Over time it will challenge the Right group’s loyalty.
But yesterday’s case is far more challenging for cooperation between government parties and cooperation Liberal Party. It is a matter that further weakens the relationship between the governing parties and an important support party.
– Not Chaos
– How will it work for the government towards the election if there will be more such cases where FRP’s parliamentary group will have a rematch on compromises government has signed cooperation parties?
it will depend on the scope. There is some way to go before voters get a picture of chaos, but there must not be many days like yesterday, says Meyer.
Civita leader Kristin Clemet emphasizes that she has not followed the case around the aircraft seat fee dense and This was why she speaks on a general basis. She believes the lack of investigation apparatus is one of the reasons why there are rounds of discussions.
– It is often difficult to develop complex policy without an examination apparatus that are available. When one has to make compromises in Parliament, so we unable to always include the ministries which sits on assessment capacity. And the problem occurs more often for minority governments, says Clemet.
Cultural Differences
But also Clemet see that there are cultural differences between the parties, which also contributes to such rounds of discussions.
– There are plenty generally a tradition that the major governance parties the Conservatives and Labor behave somewhat differently than smaller parties, such as OR and FRP.
– What challenges does it create?
– FRP has had some success at the polls, and as a dissident party, they may depend on to operate that way to get it to work, says Clemet.
Right characterized a few days ago the parties that will replace the Right / FRP-government “red-green chaos”. Now get the answers to indictment of Labor.
No comments:
Post a Comment