KrF does not distrust the proposal against the Minister of Justice – Dagbladet.no

(Dagbladet): KrF will not support a no confidence motion against Justice Minister Anders Anundsen, a proposal that not only could have overturned the justice minister – but also the entire government.

– We will propose that says Justice Minister behavior in the case of the long remaining asylum children, is highly reprehensible, says the Christian Democratic leader Knut Arild Hareide under KrF National Board today.

– I think it is pretty grotesque if they sacrifice asylum children for the government, said Professor Trond Nordby at the Department of Political Science at the University of Oslo Dagbladet on Wednesday.

Asylum children or Anundsen

In last week promoted Bård Vegar Solhjell (SV) a confidence motion against justice minister, because he believes Anundsen has not adhered to disclosure to Parliament and no longer has parliamentary confidence.

He received support from Party and Labor, and thus, the Justice Minister’s fate remained in the Liberal and Christian Democrat hands. And the question has been whether they would sacrifice their prestige with asylum children for Anundsen.

For under Anundsen were asylum children last year sent out lightning speed.

– I wish that the Liberals and Christian Democrats could use their power to say that we find ourselves unable to, on behalf of their constituents, writes Dagbladet commentator Marie Simonsen.

Now say KrF as expected: We do not go for no confidence motion.

We have a very clear message to Anders Anundsen, who has apologized and said that there is room for improvement and learning. Should Anders Anundsen still have our confidence, he must start the cleanup job we deem necessary, says Hareide from land board.

– Asylum Children have been the most important for Christian Democratic Party in the MoU. I expect that the government in line with what is uncovered, the envoys the last six months, considering the issues again. It is necessary that Anders Anundsen proceed with it, said Hareide.

Read about one of the long remaining asylum children last year were sent out with lightning speed.

daddel-own Opinion

They would rather have something called a “censure-the right to vote”, which is the strongest form of criticism they can come with without promoting a confidence motion.

Question is now KrF will gain support for daddel-Votum and how critical it will be to Anundsen. Nordby explained Wednesday that Votum must contain quite scrap criticism that Sp, Labor and SV goes with it, but that the Christian Democrats and Left can not risk being too harsh.

– How much criticism from the Christian Democrats and Left withstand before you must consider your position? asked Dagbladet Anundsen on Wednesday.

– Anyone is free to criticize anyone, said Anundsen Dagbladet.