The part of the agreement concerning asylum policy may be canceled. The Minister of Justice may have trouble getting through other major issues. These are some of the “threats” KrF and Left now comes with.
The feud asylum children between the two parties of the center and FRP is not at all. Sources Right stated that they “are working on høygear” in an attempt to resolve the matter.
Same time attempting sources in FRP to give the impression that there is nothing more to talk about. There have even all except the parliamentary leader Harald T. Nesvik and Per Sandberg additionally been muzzled. It happened at the party’s group meeting last Wednesday when the festering issue was raised during any.
FRP must not succumb
But Per Sandberg spouse Line Miriam Sandberg, who is FRP politician in Troms, manifests itself freely on the matter.
Line Miriam Sandberg, county executive in Troms. On Facebook she comes now with the following invitation: “Breaking cooperation !!!!. Please! She suggests that Knut Arild Hareide really have not had any intention of cooperation and comes with the following message:
“If KrF get as they require … yes, then you should go out of FRP government, says Per Sandberg spouse, who is county executive in Troms.
Excerpts from Facebook Since Per Sandberg spouse” Line Miriam Sandberg.
Anders Anundsen, which also survives Control committee and escapes distrust of the Christian Democrats and Left, must yield to the center parties claim to look at the cases of some seconded asylum children again. If not, he may have a hard time ahead. There is the impression one is left with after talking with key politicians in KrF and Liberals. But from FRP going the opposite signals: Buoys he of the town center, goes too far in the government to please the two parties that many in FRP are tired of.
Threaten less cooperation
In the Christian Democrats and the Liberal politicians wary of speaking aloud about what happens if the Attorney General does not provide for. KrF leader Knut Arild Hareide has previously stated that it would have “political consequences”. What they will go out on, no concretize. But sources in the Liberal Party and the Christian Democratic Party gives Aftenposten covert signals are several possibilities:
To terminate the part of the agreement only concerns asylum policy to only vote for it the two parties are – Thus far less than today negotiate compromise on matters not directly agreed in partnership
The first point has a clear disadvantage for the centrist parties: it could lead to the government can get through a somewhat more restrictive policy tightening than center parties want, because the Conservatives and the Progress Party will then be free to seek majority of Labor. And Labor has not signaled any desire for a more liberal immigration policy.
Jensen: there is a disagreement about
A source in FRP says it to terminate this part of the agreement, will be the same as breaking the entire agreement. Asked about Progress Party leader Siv Jensen looks at it the same way, she replies as follows:
– I have no need to speculate it. We have a deal, and we work well together. But all detailed questions about this case you need to ask the Minister of Justice about.
Beyond that, she will not say other than that “basically with regulatory changes is that they should work forward and not backward.”
– There is a disagreement about, she says
In FRP said that it would be hopeless to give many children a hope to get return to Norway, and then perhaps only meet half of them.
Work on høygear
It is highly uncertain whether the centrist parties and government parties fail to resolve this matter before Easter. In KrF there is very little faith that it is possible.
Thing about treating cases concerning asylum children already sent home again, lies in Parliament in the form of an SV suggestions. It is however to look at all last year mailings of long remaining children again. KrF and Left believes you should only look at cases after July 1.
It is in connection with this case, where the notes have already been delivered, it is still working to see if we can find a solution in the last small. Disclosing happening today, but the matter should not be debated until after Easter. It should be noted, however, that one need not resolve the matter in Parliament. A decision to look at some of the cases again can also take the form of the Minister of Justice sends out a circular font about it.
Was accused of “empty warehouse»
The backdrop for the case are briefly told the Christian Democrats and Left – after prolonged discussions – agreed on a new regulation on how to take more account of children’s best in asylum cases. This was about children who had lived more than four years in Norway and where one of the years had been spent in daycare or school. The regulations came into effect on December 1 last year.
As you know, last year sent out many more long remaining children than the year before. And Justice Minister was accused of sending out many before the regulations came into effect – or “empty warehouse of long remaining children,” which was his own expression. KrF and Left believes this was violation of the intent of the agreement they have with the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment