Bourgeois cooperation can crack … unless Erna and Siv sharpens itself – Dagbladet.no

- I want to get off a little steam, everything was Liberal leader would say about the speech at yesterday’s press conference. After that Dagbladet understands, the Left set clear requirements for continued civil cooperation, both FRP as ruling party and government leader Erna Solberg’s management of the troops.

Threatens cooperation

In particular immigration and integration minister Sylvi Listhaug (FRP) is perceived as a threat to bourgeois cooperation.

Prime Minister and Conservative Party leader Erna Solberg has said all along that she would carry all four non-socialist parties further. Left adopted in 2012 that government with Left, KrF and Right are desirable model. Standpoint still apply.

In connection with calls in Nydalen in winter said Skei Grande Dagbladet that she wanted Erna Solberg as prime minister in the next period, and that she herself will be minister. She says while it is not appropriate to go into government with FRP.

Do not rule with FRP

– I can say already now, that I do not for me. To sit on the rocker in Parliament, gives a lot of power, there to sit as small party in government, gives much less power, she said.

– So that the Liberals will be in government, must FRP withdraw ?

-This should I talk about in his speech to the congress. It’s the how much politics can manage to get through. There is acceptance that bears cooperation. And there I have much to show for it, says Skei Grande.

She refers in particular to a green shift in tax policy, no to expansion of Lofoten and Vesterålen and teacher lifted.

– You say that you almost have got through all that you promised before the election in 2013. So when is it appropriate in a new partnership?

– There will be a debate on this in Left forward. It is demanding’s not just about political standpoint, it’s about the statements of government officials must be liable for the entire government. If a minister believes that scientists should be instructed, I think it is something that is liable for a government. If Sylvi Listhaug talking about goodness tyranny, so booklets it for the whole government.

– Although Erna has tried to decouple the principle, I mean the I continued that principle applies. FRP has now been trying for three years. Now we’ll see if they manage to put on a rhetoric that is all that one is liable for each other, says Skei Grande.

Criticism of Erna

The Liberal leader is referring to, is Fisheries Per Sandberg expectation that IMR will deliver “business-friendly” research, and immigration and integration minister Sylvi Listhaug use of research results as justification for strict asylum policy is in children’s interests.

Skei Grande said Prime Minister Erna Solberg took readily to the criticism that came from the researcher hold.

– I think that a prime minister, and particularly a prime minister from the Conservative Party, should appreciate research much stronger, or at least have respect for the conclusions. Then she can not sit on Political quarters and say that there are a lot of research on this, for it does not, said Grande to NRK earlier this month.