the Case is updated.
It means that the government will have big problems to get a majority for this proposed budget.
It makes no sense to phase out an important incentive to get an electric car, ” says the Left-deputy leader Ola Elvestuen of the NTB.
A step in the wrong direction as the government certainly can not expect to get the KrFs support to, believe KrFs Hans Fredrik Grøvan.
” We believe that this is a completely wrong signal to give in a situation where we are looking for opportunities to reduce emissions in the transport sector, he says to NTB.
Looking towards 2025
Elvestuen points to the fact that the government itself has determined that emissions from transport can best be resolved by a gradual transition to zero – and lavutslippskjøretøyer.
the Parliament has adopted, with regjeringspartienes voices, that by 2025, all new cars sold be low – or nullutslippskjøretøy. With this proposal it becomes almost impossible to reach that goal, says Elvestuen, who leads The energy and environmental committee.
Grøvan react strongly on what he believes is a signal that you are about to remove the benefit of nullutslippsbiler.
– We must take care of the benefits that motivates and stimulates current and potential new elbilister to select nullutslippsbilene.
Under the radar
Avgiftssjokket on the electric cars going forward in the government’s budget proposal. Specifically, the government is to introduce half the annual fee for electric vehicles from 2018, then increase to the full annual fee from 2020.
at the same time adjusted the annual fee for fossilbiler from 3.135 in the years to 2.820 million in 2018. For passenger cars with particle filters cut the fee from 3.655 to 3.290 million in 2018.
With this proposal is the wrong hand and the wrong hand that takes. The result will be increased emissions, and higher costs for people who want to run environmentally friendly. It is almost incomprehensible that the government goes in for this, says Elvestuen.
Plans
That the government already sets the framework for the charges in 2018 has with the transformation of the annual fee to do.
Next year is the last time the tax administration operates in this fee. By the to leave to the insurance industry to claim it in conjunction with the mandatory bilforsikringen, saving the public an estimated 62 million a year.
From 2018 the industry will call trafikkavgift, included as part of the insurance premium. The insurance industry must then reverse the fee in its entirety to the state and bedyrer that the process in itself will not lead to higher premiums for some.
the Markup
In the proposed budget is turned it is stated that avgiftsfordelene for nullutslippsbiler over time will be phased out. The government points to the fact that the changes were notified in the revised national budget already in the last year.
In practice, it runs the Ministry of finance to put the fee on the nullutslippsbiler similar to that of motorcycles. It means that the annual fee for electric cars will increase from 445 million in the year to 1.960 million in 2018 and further to 2.820 million in 2020. The grip will provide 225 million more in revenue to the state in 2018.
– there Should be a budsjettavtale between the bourgeois parties, there is much in the proposed budget that needs to be changed. One of the points is that there is always going to be cheaper to choose an electric car in front of burning cars, says Elvestuen. (©NTB)
Media type: image Source:**image/jpeg****tb7073b4**
Caption: Ola Elvestuen thinks it is incomprehensible that the government increases the annual fee for electric cars and cuts the same fee for the fossilbiler. Photo: Fredrik Varfjell / NTB scanpix
No comments:
Post a Comment