No avgiftsultimatum from Hareide – NRK

Sentrumspartienes powerful reaction government drivstoffultimatum ensured that the climate and the green skatteskiftet stands again as konfliktsak number one before the autumn budsjettforhandlinger.

In its alternative national budget goes This hard and increases the charges with five billion more than the government proposes.

the Party will, among other things plusse 20 cents on diesel and 15 cents on gasoline beyond the government’s proposed increase of, respectively, 35 and 15 cents.

But at the same time as the four samarbeidspartiene has promised the other a tax – and avgiftsomlegging that will provide significant emission reductions in 2017, the christian democratic party has no “ultimate claim on which measures” taken in use.

– Although we have a small increase on the drivstoffavgiftene beyond the government’s proposal, so it is not so that we must have it in place as long as we see a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, ” says Knut Arild Hareide to NRK.

Want to use green taxes on the welfare of the

Budsjettavtalen from last year also says that increased taxes on the CO₂ to give a “sectoral reduction of other taxes and fees”.

But the principle goes Better away from in its alternative budget.

Green skatteskifte in budsjettavtalen

This was Right, Right, Left and the christian democratic party has agreed in budsjettavtalen:

“the Storting asks the government in the budget for 2017 promote the proposal for a green skatteskift as part of the follow-up of the setting from the green skattekommisjon. Such a shift should involve an increase of taxes on the emissions of CO2 motsvart of a sectoral reduction of other taxes and fees. Duties and skatteomleggingen shall be of a size that amplifier through the and provides significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions”

During the press conference said Hareide that he does not go on the premise that the money the state takes in on the environmental charges, and to automatically give tax relief on the other end. The party will use the income from increased environmental charges also on welfare benefits.

– Means that the Sector will not follow this section of the agreement?

the core issues: families with children, school, climate, and poverty is KrFs headlines ” says Knut Arild Hareide.

Photo: Ruud, Vidar / NTB scanpix

of course, We must be on the principle, when we shall find an agreement. But now we add up our primærstandpunkt, answer Hareide.

According to the Sector also breaks the government’s model for a green skatteskifte with budsjettavtalen. They believe the measures do not provide significant greenhouse gas emissions, and that motorists are compensated too well.

When the government itself put forward a budget where they look away from the consensus, they cannot expect that we shall follow it. Someone has obviously changed the rules of the game along the way, said KrFs fiscal policy spokesman Hans Olav Syversen during the press conference.

Green skatteskifte: Fuel and compensatory measures

• the Government’s proposal to green skatteskifte in the budget for 2017 means that bensinavgiften be increased by 15 cents, dieselavgiften with 35 cents and mineraloljeavgiften by 20 øre per litre.
• the annual Fee is reduced by 12 per cent, the rates in pendlerfradraget be increased by six cents and avskrivningssatsene for trucks, vans and taxis will be higher.
• introduced a tilskuddsordning to reduce bompengetakster outside the major cities. The government will spend 500 million on this purpose, which will give a reduction of around 10 per cent in bompengesatsene on the state and fylkesveiprosjekter.
• Total gives the two points net tax avgiftsreduksjoner for motorists in excess of 900 million.
• Source: Ministry of finance/NTB

Some must lose

In its alternative budget reverses the Progress, therefore, the government’s proposal to lower the annual fee and bomsatsene.

But for Fp, there is no question to go with the increased drivstoffavgiftene without sugar pill for motorists in other ways.

SMERTEGRENSE: – the Left need to show a little respect for that Frp actually has moved very far from his primærstandpunkt, and that we can’t walk anymore and are depending on that it is net easing in the package, ” says Example.

Photo: Bendiksby, Terje / NTB scanpix

– It is very much on the green side that is forhandlingsbart, but just in the package there is a balance that is important for us to maintain, ” says the progress party’s fiscal spokesperson Hans Andreas Example.

But for that the four parties shall agree someone must give up. This says they can’t see for themselves to support the budget without that also Left is with. Thus it boils down to who need to lose face: klimapartiet Left or bilpartiet Frp.

– Now we have not begun to negotiate yet, so it is too early to speculate about what happens if the do not agree, say Example.