Drevland: I was bugged by the police – Aftenposten

Thursday morning held Trude Drevland press conference in Aschehougs premises, where she presented her book “a Little private”.

In the book takes Drevland an almighty showdown with bergenspolitiet and the press, and the methods that have been used in the aftermath of that korrupsjonssaken against her rolled up last fall.

She also tells openly about their own depression in his new book.

Work with the book has been running for over two years, and started long before the so-called korrupsjonssaken started.

It has been both liberating and terribly difficult. It put into words so much vulnerable, so much private. It has been especially, and it is touching a very difficult and serious matter with caution has been difficult, ” said Drevland when she presented the book in the morning.

– I’m in my worst livskrise

What has it done with you, Drevland questions about the press conference.

It has been good to get said a lot of what I have experienced, and it has done well to have put a good number of things in place. But it is written at the same time that I’m in my worst livskrise.

On questions about what she’s thinking about a case, she says:

This is a very serious matter. It is the only thing I can think of. It dominates every hour of every day of my life. The wait is, and has been completely horrible.

Bugged

In the book, she explains among other things about an episode in connection with the final interrogation of her in may of this year:

“You have been telefonavlyttet. From 11. september 2015 to 8. October 2015″, told avhøreren her, ” says Drevland, before she writes further:

“It felt like I was in shock. The body was completely numb and the blood disappeared from the brain”.

“From before they had deprived me of the honor, the role of the mayor and my political career. Now stripping me, all my self-worth, where they had sat and overheard any conversation, private or not.”

Feel pre-judged

Drevland does not have much nice to say about their premier partikolleger in the city council in the book.

While prime minister Erna Solberg, Norwegian trade and industry minister Monica Mæland and lokallagsledelsen in Bergen the Right of the praise for the care and support in the “Somewhat private”, the Conservative senior people in the council don’t have the same certificate:

“From one day to the other I was reduced from being a valuable resource around the clock to be totally useless. It should be food for thought for everyone who votes Right in Bergen, for if there is one party that shall be a guarantor for the ceilings, the rule of law and justice, then it is just Right. Nevertheless forhåndsdømte Bergen Conservative bystyregruppes management me and disregarded smooth uskyldspresumpsjonen”, type Drevland.

Wrong focus

In the book writing Drevland about his childhood, early political career and family. But a lot given a lot of space is naturally devoted to the ongoing korrupsjonssiktelsen against her, as well as the case against her husband, Odd Drevland.

The former mayor uses a lot of space on to direct sharp criticism against the bergenspolitiet. She points, among other things, that during the period the interrogations of her was, was it 4700 uavsluttende and important matters. The Media also wrote about an ugly overgrepssak against women and a case of abuse against eight children.

“the Cases it has taken months and still months to finish. Everything is justified by resource scarcity. But my case has been a priority. In april 2016 sat seven people still and studied, then had they held on for eight months and was still not finished. I’m hardly alone when I think this is sad?”

Leaks

Drevland also claim that the media repeatedly informed about the development in korrupsjonssaken before her.

“How was it that the NRK was informed and I am not. How is it that The new york times got the information and I am not. How is it that the police leaked like a sieve to the media? Who in the police force stands for or has approved this practice. Why ran Bergens Tidende’s own investigation? This procedure has continued the whole time. I will not be oriented. The lawyer my is not oriented. Not before the press is informed”.

Also the decision to resume the investigation, as well as the charge says she was known for her through media coverage. The mayor’s experience that neither the chief of police or the district attorney had put into the case, but gjenoptok it because of the media’s writings. She believes that the media decide the police’s agenda, and that these be given first access to the drug.

“What services have the media made the police since they deserve this special processing? And why are people in the police themselves obviously control of the reporters?”

Feel poorly treated

Also, several of her former partikollegaer get to hear it in Drevlands biography. That a evalueringsutvalg after the election last year concluded that the indictment against her was one of the reasons that the Right did it so bad and lost power to the Ap, drops her heavy for the chest. She characterizes the report as inaccurate, and stated that the press in its habit of faith was not interested in getting up such nuances.

“Anyway, I got the most personal votes in the Right in Bergen”.

She does not hide the feeling of being pre-judged in lokallaget, and comes with the repeated claims of faslkhet and pettiness in the Bergen Right. Also Bergensavisen and BT criticised for poor coverage of the case, and some journalists accused of being “obviously mentally absent” and lacking empathy.

“I’ve got more than enough of Bergens Tidende because I do not remember the lambs of the first details, but even the stuff they don’t to share the facts correct.

Here is Drevland case in 7 points the Police will prosecute Trude Drevland for gross corruption