Recognizing came after the minister had heard the supreme commander of the Norwegian police, police director Odd Reidar Humlegård, and the Chief of Police Immigration Service (PU), explain themselves for Standing Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs yesterday.
They claimed both first to the Committee that ANUNDSEN marching for 2014 was perceived by the police, such Anundsen himself had claimed. This order said that while remaining asylum children should no longer be prioritized especially by deportation from Norway, unlike in 2013.
Bergens Tidende revealed on December 2 that the crucial management document at the police was wrong, but both the police and the justice minister have all Currently argued that letter mistake had nothing to say. They have said – and also reiterated yesterday – that the political signals were understood and implemented. The problems for Anundsen resigned when police chiefs would explain the committee exactly what they had learned.
– Would not had significance
– When it comes politics change, so mean PU and I that the clear change in policy came even solution and then a permanent solution in the form of a regulation, said Humlegårdsvägen to the committee.
It was in no way this Anundsen said in Parliament on October 6 last year, when he assured that government had “softened focus” when it came to long remaining children, and that they had “made it on”, so they long remain should no longer take precedence over families.
It was not helped by the PU Chief Kvigne had said that the adjustment in the wording matter would not have had anything to say, because PU depended on powerful signals to make changes in the selection of who will like and who should be. Cause: There has been so difficult to find enough people who could be sent out, that the police have had to take those who have been available – while remaining or not.
– Whatever had been left in the disposal leaflet, they had same people been sent out in 2014, said Kvigne, which meant a law or regulation to shield the long remaining asylum children were the only thing that could have had any practical effect.
Had to change BT chronicle
Anundsen was obviously not prepared for this development. Friday evening, after the hearing, he had few changes were made in an article today he has published in Bergens Tidende. In the script, which he had delivered before the hearing, had the minister written the following:
“PU other words familiar with the changing priorities and even says that they let the basis of their work.”
When BT after the hearing did Anundsen note that this simply was not right, neither with what he had just explained in Parliament, or with what PU chief Kvigne had said the same location, called ANUNDSEN advisors to Bergen and got made changes in screenwriting. In chronicle written word today, writes Anundsen now instead that “PU should other words been familiar with the changing priorities.”
– Can not do much
When asylum children case cracked on December 2, was police director called on ANUNDSEN office the same day. Three days after police concluded the Director that the error had not received any consequences. Yesterday had Anundsen admit that it is not certain that this is true – even though it was this minister wrote to Parliament in a letter before Christmas, citing Humlegårdsvägen.
– It says police director continued, that the case not has had practical consequences, said Anundsen to BT last night.
– Do you feel confident that it is correct?
– I can not really do much else than to assume their assessment of that question. They have the expertise to evaluate it. I as a minister can not detail control it. But I assume that it is hold in what they say.
– 2 December you said that the possible practical consequences of letter error should be investigated. How would that happen?
– First and foremost in that we asked police director go through matter. Then he says that it has not had consequences. I must relate to.
– When did you realize that the political signals still was not perceived in the police?
– It came really first good forward During the hearing today, when I came in doubt whether they had perceived political principles, said Anundsen.
Published:
No comments:
Post a Comment