The Oslo District Court came Friday night.
– The court finds that the accused is reasonably suspected of criminal offenses that may result higher punishment of a prison in six months, namely for violation of Penal Code § 140 of the Penal Code § 227 second penalty option as described in the indictment, writes Judge Finn Haugen.
term
Penal Code §140 public inciting or prompted initiation of a criminal offense or glorified such
On Friday 20 February 2015 in an interview on NRK premises at NRK in Oslo, which was broadcast on national television on Wednesday 25 February, he stated about Halmat Goran, which he by judgment of 6 December 2012 was convicted of murder threatened: ‘I’ll send a gift to whoever kills him. ‘ This statement came after he immediately prior to the interview had specified that: ‘Not only those who listen to me, but everyone knows the punishment could kill him. All! ‘ The call must be seen in the context that he, through his authority in parts of the extreme Islamist environment over time. on several occasions and facing a larger circle of people have stated that Goran must be killed.
Straffeloven§227 other straffalteroativ for under particularly aggravating circumstances in word or deed, having threatened with a criminal offense that may result in higher penalty than 6 months in jail, under such circumstances that the threat was fit to evoke serious fear
In a TV interview with the Kurdish channel NRT sent Thursday 12 February 2015, as well as in television interview as described in In post, he proposed statements Goran Halmat as described in items I and similar statements, which after they mail In-described circumstances were suitable tila evoke serious fears. It is very aggravating threats applies solicitation murder, that he conveys threats to a very large group of people through national television and threats as they are set forth, by their nature, will trigger an uncontrollable and irrevesibel effect in the violent extremist groups they reach out.
The ruling was in line with police claim.
– Two Krekar
When Mullah Krekar arrived remand hearing clock 14.06, he had the following message for journalists were:
– I think only of my religion. I do not think other Mullah Krekar. There are two Krekars and two roads. A Krekar I am, and I have the road to god my Mullah Krekar and other and other road is the PST and the Conservatives and other uses. The media and Islam phobia. I am responsible for the initial Mullah Krekar, not the other.
– It is a shame that you should straight into prison again. It is a shame for Norway. There are 51 time I have come to court, says Krekar.
Retrieved by police Thursday
Krekar was arrested at his home Thursday night. Background are statements he made during the interview with NRK on Wednesday.
RIGHT AGAIN: Krekar arriving hearing Friday afternoon. Photo: Ola Haram / TV 2
Krekar is accused of inciting criminal acts and to having placed in the interview.
Krekar pleaded not guilty when the indictment was read. Meanwhile he agreed to answer questions.
– Is there anything you said in the interview that you believe today is clearly wrong, or that you regret?
– No, I think it’s been misinterpreted.
– Can you understand that the NN may be intimidated by your statements?
– No, I think not. He has been afraid before.
PRESS: There was a lot of press in the Oslo District Court today. Photo: Ola Haram / TV 2
Krekar said that there is nothing new in what he has said, however, and he may well repeat statements 20 times.
– Instead of laying low, select you give these two interviews? You could well refrained set up in NRK, the judge commented.
Islam-infringement is a mortal sin
In the hearing came judge into it with proportionality, whether to cause death to create a drawing that many find highly offensive and insulting.
– Do you perceive it as a proportionate sanction? judge asked.
– This with violation of Islam, so there are two different interpretations. Some accept, others not. I’m with those who do not accept this. Part of the explanation is what Islam believes and this is a violation of Islam, and they shall die as punishment , responded Krekar.
– Traditional gift giving when one is happy
The charges against Krekar was on Friday extended to include threats. Police believe he has made threats that offenses under Section 227.
In the indictment emphasizes a statement which fell about Halmat Goran, that Krekar is convicted of murder threatened.
– I’ll send a gift if someone kills him, said the mullah told NRK.
At the hearing explained Krekar what he should have meant by this statement:
– I has said that if he is killed, then they get a gift. There is a Kurdish tradition to give a gift when you are happy. Eg if you have a child, or your son get into university. If someone gives me this message, so they deserve a gift.
The second point covered by the indictment are statements in an interview with the Kurdish channel NRT. The interview was sent on 12 February.
Krekar influence
– If I asking someone to go to death, so do maybe 50, says Krekar questions from police inspector Vegard Rødås about his influence.
– So you think you have great influence when ?, asks Roda.
– There are religious influences, political influence. It is from person to person. One can get ten answers to the same question, but one can see which comes from the Quran.
It’s hard to get concrete answers, says Roda and concludes questioning of Krekar.
Meling: – Krekar says what he thinks
Police believe the terrorist danger Krekar exposes Norway for, is intolerable and must be a stop to.
– Kreakars statements helps aggravate terrorist danger, said police inspector Vegard Rødås in court.
The police will ask for four weeks imprisonment for Krekar.
The European Human Rights
Krekar defends Brynjar Meling says that there is nothing new in it Krekar said.
– He says the same as he has said all the time. He is convicted for having said this earlier and double jeopardy is not allowed, said Meling.
Meling believes it is problematic that the prosecutor cites this as a terrorist threat and that in so case would used terror clause if this was the case.
– The only new feature is that Krekar says he would have given a gift to those who have made the Qur’an believe is right punishment, says Meling.
The allegation that there was nothing new in Krekar statement is the prosecutor disagree with.
– It is not true that if one is convicted and has served for murder threats earlier, then it is not so that one can threaten people on life year after year without being punished for this. On the contrary, he should be punished harder for having made this threat again, said Roda.
No comments:
Post a Comment