Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Another expert: – Hardly this design was proven – Daily

– It is not this design was proven. At least not this week, ” says Frank Aarebrot, professor at the Department of comparative politics, University of Bergen, to Aftenbladet.

He emphasizes that if the Sector were to withdraw from the budsjettforhandlingene Wednesday, as the government has still time to seek support from other parties and find other solutions to the situation.

the Political editor of Our Country, Berit Strøyer Aalborg, says it is difficult to say what the Progress will get to do, and that they fear a tapssituasjon anyway.

– They fear to get into a situation where they get the blame for to save the progress party, a weakened government who do not want a green change their immigration policy with Sylvi Listhaug or her rhetoric. And on the other hand, they fear to be the party that gets blamed for tilting the country into this design was proven, ” says Berit Strøyer Aalborg to the NTB.



Clean Right-government

Should Better follow the Left and pull out of the negotiations, prime minister Erna Solberg (H) will also do as Gro Harlem Brundtlands pure Party-the government did in the 80′s, says Aarebrot.

– She can request an authority to control further for a given, short period of time while looking for new opportunities for the majority, says Aarebrot.

Other options can be a pure Right-the government, who must seek support in Parliament from case to case, or a government consisting of Right, Left, and Christian democratic Party.

Read also: Solberg says nothing



Uninteresting for the Ap

If it was going to be this design was proven, the Ap leader Jonas Gahr Støre be little interested in to form a government only a scant year before the parliamentary election, ” says valgforsker Bernt Aardal.

I doubt that Ap will take the governmental power now. Opposition parties are coming in any case to use these budsjettforhandlingene against the coalition parties for what it is worth, ” says Aardal to the Newspaper.

Aarebrot agrees in this, but you think the scenario is unlikely.

– It is completely utopian that Solberg would do such a thing. What should she go to the options on then? It would be a complete declaration of bankruptcy from the bourgeois side, which today has the majority in Parliament, says Aarebrot.



collusion

The political editor of Our Country believes forhandlingsbruddet whatsoever is not collusion from the Left and KrFs page, where the Left saves the carbon footprint of their Sector to the government.

– There is more prestige in firepartiprosjektet for the Left than it is for the Better. Progress has increasingly held the door up for the Labour party, while the Left has been clear about the desire for a bourgeois collaboration, ” says Strøyer Aalborg.

She recalls that Hareide has previously stated that the Sector does not want to be alone as sentrumsparti and negotiate with the government.

What I still believe is true. But it does not mean that they can’t, ” says Strøyer Aalborg.

(NTB)

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment