Monday, February 9, 2015

Monika mother about police regret: “Oh my god” – Dagbladet.no

Monika mother about police regret: "Oh my god" – Dagbladet.no

OSLO / LONDON (Dagbladet): Hordaland police being criticized for a number of deficiencies and undesirable aspects of the investigation in Monika case in the report today was submitted by Public Prosecutions investigation group.

Police Geir Gudmundsen regretted afternoon extra load Monika mother Kristina Sviglanskaja been exposed.

– We will do what we can to avoid that something like this should never happen again. We understand that there has been an extreme burden for Monika’s mother. The sorry we strongly. It is regrettable that we have not resumed investigation earlier after what came from the internal whistleblower says Gudmundsen.

“Oh my god”

Dagbladet spoke with counsel Stig Nilsen shortly after he afternoon spoke with Kristina Sviglanskaja. Nilsen says she appreciates the apology, although she thinks it took a long time before it came.

– She said “oh my god” and that it was surprising. She is happy apology, says Nilsen Dagbladet.

Eight-year-old Monika Sviglinskaja was found dead at his home in Sunderland in November 2011. The police dismissed the case as suicide. In autumn, a 32 year old man, Monika, former stepfather, arrested and charged with murder

Responds to questioning of mother

One individual circumstances Public Prosecutions investigation team reacts most is a final examination of the mother in March 2012. In the interrogation she was presented police then concluded that it had not happened anything punishable, that the main theory theirs was that the girl had killed herself and let her see technical and tactical ones.

In their report investigators that they can not see what investigation purposes interrogation could have.

As VG previously written believes former NCIS Top Asbjørn Hansen, who was hired by counsel Stig Nilsen to examine the matter, that interrogation emerges as an attempt to manipulate mother. Public Prosecutions working endorses Hansen criticism.

  • – We do not see that it had any significance investigation and see that they have rendered some facts wrong, says chief public prosecutor Bjorn Soknes Dagbladet.


No FAQ

The prosecuting lawyer, chief investigator and site investigators were conferred before interrogation.

– The Working Group is surprised that no one ever questioned the purpose and implementation of interrogation.

Reviewers believes police implementation way is likely to weaken relative confidence police investigation.

– The unfortunate by police carrying way reinforced by the counsel had access to the documents, and thus had a poor basis for assessing police investigation and conclusion.

Police Gudmundsen told Dagbladet that he in general sorry strongly toward his mother for the workload she is exposed to.

– I apologize also to her when it comes to what she was presented in the last final interrogation. I can not go into detail on this now, but must await the Bureau conclusions since they also are investigating this part of the case, said police chief Geir Gudmundsen.



– No determination

Norwegian Bureau for the Investigation of Police Affairs investigating the case. Lawyer Nilsen says the circumstances surrounding the interrogation was a central part of the review. He was even present in the interrogation.

– I witnessed a police force that had concluded, which showed a willingness to listen to my client’s objections, he says to Dagbladet.

He says they are satisfied with apologies they’ve got today.

– We are now focusing on the new investigation. The main thing for us now is to get answers to what happened to her, and we have a good working relationship with the current investigation team, says Nilsen.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment