The controversial mullah released from Kongsvinger prison on 25 January after serving finished the sentence he received in December 2012 for threats against Erna Solberg and three Kurds.
Although Krekar already in February 2003 was adopted expelled from Norway for reasons of national security, Krekar plan to move back to his home in Oslo when he again becomes a free man. Where should he not be allowed to stay long, said parliament Jan Arild Ellingsen (FRP).
– How fast must Krekar out of Norway?
– I hope we manage to get him out in During this year, he said.
It is not good enough, according to party colleague Ulf Leirstein.
– I see that our deputy Per Sandberg has said that Mullah Krekar should leave the country during 2015. I think it is too far perspective, says parliament Leirstein.
– I want my next Christmas already this summer, and both me and our voters will a solution with Krekar out of country, be a perfect summer gift, he adds.
Failed “hunting”
The ambition of FRP holders are in line with what the party for years have wanted and demanded, without getting approval for. Ellingsen was newly elected parliament when he first asked questions about Krekar in Parliament. It happened in 2001 after articles in Dagsavisen and BergensAvisen that Police Intelligence Service (current Police Security Service) had started investigation of the mullah.
– Since I’ve driven Krekar hunting without special big success, says Ellingsen now.
– Will it cost FRP even more voters if you do not soon succeed in efforts to get Krekar sent out of Norway?
– Yes, it is quite clear, answers Ellingsen.
Not detention
Before FRP came in government, urged the party that Krekar had detained pending a shipment from Norway, but now says FRP Minister and Justice Minister Anders Anundsen, that this is not possible.
– The Government has considered a number of measures, but we must deal with human rights. There is no legal basis in current legislation to set Krekar in custody, says Anundsen NRK.
Clearly in opposition
Labor, as of FRP-ers were called “impotence party” partly because of Krekar case while the party was in government, now use this opportunity to turn back.
– When Mullah Krekar is generally freely in Norway, while the country has a Justice of FRP, it sets Progress justice policy in a more realistic light than ever before, says Hadia Tajik, Aps justice policy spokesman, told NRK.
Virtually all leading FRP-ers have for years demanded that Krekar must leave Norway.
“Progress requires of government exhibits Mullah Krekar immediately,” said Per Sandberg in 2002.
“We will not allow further delaying in this matter,” said Hagen in 2005.
“First law changed so that Krekar can be put in custody. Then he out of the country, “assured Jensen in 2009.
– This shows that cases that look obviously simple out, is not always what it says Ellingsen now.
Progress credibility
– Why do you think it solution during the year?
– I am sure that our Conservative government and members are looking high and low for a viable solution. I think it will end with an agreement between Norwegian and Iraqi authorities guaranteeing that Krekar not risk the death penalty. The alternative is that Krekar even find that Norway is no longer a budding place for him, responding Ellingsen.
He believes “a mailing of Krekar will be a huge political victory for the government.”
Leirstein on their side believes that “it is incredibly important that a FRP Minister resolve the Krekar case.”
– This also applies to the Progress Party’s credibility as a government party, he points out.
No self-criticism
– Do you understand now that the coalition government had difficulty getting Krekar out of the country?
– No. The situation in Iraq was far easier when the coalition ruled the country. The once stood US forces in Iraq, and there was a functioning government that increasingly had control of the country. Now make the Islamic State the situation is far more difficult. Our criticism of the then government was therefore rightly responds Leirstein.
Neither Ellingsen see any reason to self-criticism.
– For our part, it was important that there should never be any doubt about where we stood politically.
No comments:
Post a Comment