Borgarting court of appeal wrote in its ruling that the conditions for taking the petition of closed doors under the explanations from the two accused to follow, are not met.
Spesialenheten for police matters prayed for closed doors during the entire explanation to Jensen and under parts of the explanation for the medtiltalte narkotikasmugleren,
the district Court dismissed the petition, and Spesialenheten appealed the ruling to the court of appeal.
– Can go an unsafe future in the face
REFUSING BLAME: The former polititoppen Eirik Jensen.
Photo: Junge, Heiko / NTB scanpix
Spesialenheten think there is a danger Cappelen and his family’s life and health if it becomes known that he has given information to the police. This concern is supported by Gjermund cappelen in his defense, Benedict de Vibe.
He talked with NRK about the problem earlier this week.
If it is named, correctly or not, and here we believe that we are above both, so will the information that he should have given information in a specific case could easily lead to the fact that he runs an unsafe future in the face.
I think also the other party – to the extent that one should say counterpart – is very well aware of, says the Vibe
The Vibe has previously said that Cappelen never has denied that he has given Jensen information, but that this “has not constituted the bulk of their relationship”.
In their input to the court of appeal, which are reproduced in Friday’s ruling, states inter alia that the court should close the doors to “avoid the danger to life and health for Cappelen and his family.”
– Are somewhat closed anyway
The Vibe has previously said that Cappelen never has denied that he has given Jensen information, but that this “has not constituted the bulk of their relationship”.
Spesialenheten for police matters said in his contribution to the appellate court that the trial is necessary to get in on the “information of a sensitive nature”. The appellate court believes, however, that it is not good enough justified why this can “pose a danger to life and health”.
The Vibe points out that in all cases, think that parts of the negotiations have to go without a push in the saddle, but believe the parties will find a way to solve this.
– Something closed it will be anyway. It is not to talk about that either explanation in its entirety to go for open doors, says the Vibe.
– Will not have the speculation in retrospect
Eirik Jensen has even said that he doesn’t want to save some in the upcoming trial. Eirik Jensen’s defender John Christian the Fire is clearly that he believes it is appropriate that the defendant’s explanations to go for open doors.
– In such a serious case where a trusted police officer shall be alleged to be superkriminell, it is important for him that the litigation is public. He has nothing to hide, and will not have the speculation in retrospect when he is acquitted. Cappelen shall not make claims in dølgsmål that cannot stand the light of day, wrote the Fire in an e-mail to NRK earlier this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment