The experienced MP believes that the Government through kicking Labor and Welfare Director Joakim Lystad trying to disclaim responsibility for an entity to poor effort NAV.
-Lystad played by the notes he received from Parliament and government to lead the largest government agency, which also has been through major changes. This is mildly complicated. The job he is set il to do, inter alia, to employ people with reduced working, getting worse and worse, says Lundteigen.
He recalls that in today’s hectic work can be demanding enough for people with full work to hang out with. -It Gets harder and harder to find space for employees who need customization because they are disabled or otherwise impaired work, says Lundteigen.
-There is now happening with NAV chief Joakim Lystad is grossly unfair, says Lundteigen who alone will give the minister Eriksson blamed alone. -It’s Government that this way shoot the pianist, I do not think Eriksson has done this on their own, says Lundteigen, which is the Centre Party representative in the Labour and Social Affairs Committee in Parliament.
Left trust Eriksson
Parliamentarian Sveinung Rotevatn in Left is also a member of Labour and Social Affairs Committee. He has a greater understanding of the unusual step of giving an agency director fired.
It is important that a minister has full confidence agency leader. I trust the assessment Eriksson has done. There have been many challenging processes and many serious cases in NAV. If problems are at the top boss or with other leaders in NAV can not I consider, it is a consideration that the minister sits much closer than I do. I have confidence that Labour and Social Affairs Robert Eriksson handles this in a good way, says Rotevatn.
SV: – Important changes
SV Kirsti Bergstø believe it is not appropriate to give NAV Director Joakim Lystad blame for everything that’s wrong with NAV. But she believes nevertheless changes in top management may provide opportunities for other necessary changes elsewhere in the organization.
It is necessary with changes in NAV so that resources are transferred from top to bottom and so employees have authority locally and meet people where they live. It is necessary to confront it does not. It has become very rigid measurement systems and reporting requirements and staff have been an everyday which involves satisfying systems and reporting, well as much as to meet users honorably says Bergstø, who has been employed by NAV home Nesseby in Finnmark.
She remembers well the day it came scorecards where it should be crossed in forms so that it became green, yellow or red light depending on which goals were met.
-This changed parts of our mentality, it was important to work on ways that trigger green lights, rather than looking at how we could work most effectively to help the user says Bergstø.
Critical to consultants
SV has been strongly critical of NAV extensive use of consultants, which has cost hundreds of millions. -It Would be wiser to use NAV important resource – the employees and officers – to get a more accommodating members claim that meets the users in a better way, says Bergstø.
She believes that Eriksson and the Government of the time must several measures, which must binge NAV in better contact with the users where they live. -And Then centralization not be right, says Bergstø.
Published:
No comments:
Post a Comment