Here goes the border, Listhaug: Lista that could lead to new collision with Hareide and … – Dagbladet.no

(Dagbladet): Tuesday put immigration and integration minister Sylvi Listhaug (FRP) presented its austerity proposal at an extraordinary cabinet meeting – and despite hefty criticism, it is according to NTB not expecting her make major changes from the original draft proposal, which was presented during Christmas.

Thus, it may be time for a new conflict between the government and supporting parties Liberal Party and Christian Democratic Party.

Must be within international law

Left has the paper said no to all of the forty proposals circulated for comment – and proposed a separate forty bulleted list that they believe are in line with international law.

Krf for its part highlighted three areas they have difficulty going on.

Both parties have been concerned that the proposals Listhaug promotes must be within international law and asylum Settlement parties signed last fall.

It is especially great controversy about these points:

– Police opportunity to reject the merits of asylum seekers at the border (V)

– Temporary residence permit for unaccompanied minors (V and Krf)

– the removal of the condition that there be no “unreasonable” if one is to send an asylum seeker back to a safe part of the homeland instead of providing protection in Norway. (Krf)

– The requirement for four years’ employment or education in Norway before family reunion. (Krf)

– The requirement that refugees must have income to apply for family reunification. (V and Krf).

Refugees who seek family have previously been exempt from the so-called subsistence. Listhaug want refugees to be covered by revenue requirement which applies to other groups in society, and that the draft proposal be increased from 252,472 to NOK 305,200 per year.

A number of points have been criticized for being in contravention of international law.

Dagbladet was in contact with both parties Friday night, but none of them want to elaborate on how “pain threshold” goes beyond these points.

Left-management

Liberal leader Trine Skei Grande said she hopes Listhaug seen through Left alternative suggestions list when she submits his plan next week.

The reason why Left wreck all forty proposals were not necessarily that they believed everyone was outside international law – but that the party believed the preparatory work was too bad.

– It got a clarification in relation to the international conventions, it contained factual errors, and it was so bad technically founded that even her own professional bodies responded. It was the totality that made us actually said no to the whole package. Now she get a chance to put forward again, and then I hope she has listened to the process that has been, says Skei Grande about Listhaug.

She says she hopes Erna Solberg (H) as prime minister will pursue policies that maximize endorses as “FRP constitute a minority and an extremity.”

Do not have racket

Immigration Political spokesman Geir Toskedal in Krf also expectations for the Listhaug adds up to a week.

– Main Stand point is that we share the view that there must be new measures in place, and that is something we should constructively contribute. So we have said that there are three main areas we want to change, and the basis for it is human rights and child rights conventions. We expect that the coming is within the broad settlement that Parliament has done, and have no time to lose on a new wide-ranging debate. We in Krf want to get started on this now, he says.

– It foreshadowed that no any major changes?

– There is a speculation that I will not consider.

‘; }); $ ( ‘#related – + WoId +’ div.related_items’). Html (items); //saveElementAjax(Ext.get(woId)); }; $ (Document) .ready (function () {// if ($ ( ‘#docs’). Find ( ‘. Related container’). Size () == 0) $ .ajaxSetup ({cache: false}) ; $ .getJSON ( ‘http://www.kjendis.no/2.0/lib/relatedarticles.functions.php5?jsoncallback=?’, {limit: 4, tags: ‘news’, id: 123, articleID: 43724669} , fetchRelatedArticles);});